You Tell Me It's The NWO ... Well you know ... You better Free Your Mind Instead.

Conspiracy. The Truth! Don't Tread on Me! Don't Tread on My Truth! This is the way it goes! Don't listen to them! They are deceiving you!! They're going to take away all your rights!"

Conspiracy. "You're crazy to even think of those things!" "Did you get approval from the National Academy of Sciences, the FDA, the AMA, the GOV. HUH?" "Don't fall for THEIR lies!!" "Don't even think of voting for THAT crazy politician!" "This is the way we've done it for decades. Why do you crazies want to undo everything?"

(This is the kind of rhetoric you see and read all over the TV, newspapers, and internet.)

Aaaargh!  Enough already!  

The real truth has to be discerned by every individual thinking for themselves and coming up with concensus, yet never settling to accept any one idea as absolute.

Subgenius pamphlet

 2020 Covid19 Lockdowns

- How well have they really been working?

- Is it really worth the "side effects" of economic hardships, domestic strife, emotional issues, suicides?

- How do the countries with strict lockdown policies and mask mandates compare with those with no lockdowns nor mask mandates?

Check out this - and do your own research:

https://www.exposelockdowns.com/

Tongue Twister for Brits ?

Say this ten times fast: "The source of the sauce is a sort of salty swordfish."

Challenge for Flat Earthers: Quito to Nairobi

Fans of the Flat Earth paradigm use the flattened projection map used for the United Nations logo, where the North Pole is the center of the map, and Antarctica is an ice shelf that surrounds the outer rim of the livable area of the earth, and it's not known how far past that surrounding ice shelf you have to go to reach the edge of the earth - if it exists.

Here's one challenge I'd pose to those who promote the Flat Earth paradigm over the Globe Earth paradigm: What route would be the most direct and shortest route to fly between Quito, Ecuador and Nairobi, Kenya non-stop? We can all agree that the shortest distance that we can travel from point A to point B is a straight line (as "straight" as the shape of the earth will allow...). Right?

Both Quito and Nairobi are within approximately 115 miles from the Equator. Using the globe earth, the shortest and most direct route to take would be to go east from Quito, staying within 115 miles from the Equator all the way. Using the U.N. flat projection map that Flat Earth promoters use, the most direct route would be to veer north of the Equator, crossing the mid Atlantic ocean and Europe, and back down south to Kenya.

On the globe earth, the Equator is unique in that you can follow that line east or west, and the shortest route from point A to point B on the Equator is to follow the Equator - either east or west - whichever is closer. On the U.N. logo flat earth model, the Equator line is a circle over a flat plane, so the shortest distance to another point on the circle would not be to follow the circle, obviously.

Here's the challenge. Have two jets (filled with a lot of fuel): One to fly the "Equator line" route from Quito to Nairobi - staying within 115 miles from the Equator; and the other one to fly the U.N. flat earth route that takes the plane northwest to over the mid-Atlantic and Europe and back south towards Africa. Which plane will have flown the shortest distance?

Here's the URL to a page showing and describing the U.N. logo showing the flat earth projection map favored by promoters of Flat Earth: http://www.un.org/depts/dhl/maplib/flag.htm

It would be difficult to convince me that the shortest route would be other than the Equatorial route. There's so much more that can be said and argued on this issue, but I'll leave it here for now.

9/11 - The Real Truth

Sometimes a good, sober look at actual evidence proves an explanation that's "ruffling some feathers" out there - on both sides of the debate. When I came across this, it hit me as "yes, this is it." Dr Judy Wood's book "Where Did the Towers Go" takes a fresh and sober look at the aftermath of the 9/11 World Trade Center (WTC) tragedy, free from any preconceived notions, and shows how the the evidence directly points to "directed energy" weapons as the cause of the disintegration of the WTC towers. 


There's no way that planes or conventional heat-based explosives could have caused the 9/11 WTC tragedy, and that's exactly what screamed in my head from the first time I saw the incident aired on TV. Almost all of the building "dustified" and clouded out before any building parts hit the ground, save for some of the aluminum plating ("wheat chex"). Fully intact, unburnt papers were flying around amid the dust cloud. Paper would be the FIRST thing to burn in a fire or heat explosion!! There were hardly any seismic effects from such a huge structure when it "went away" or "dustified" (Dr Wood says it was not a "collapse"). 


Dr Judy Wood stays close to the facts and evidence and what they directly say about what really happened on 9/11. Her case is rock solid enough to uphold in a court of law. Way to go, Dr Judy Wood !! 

http://wheredidthetowersgo.com

Plea for Activists

Discern. Be wise. Don't dichotomize.

Disclaimer and Fair Use Notice About My Blogs

Disclaimer:  The blogs posted here on http://crnel727.blogspot.com contain numerous links and references to outside sources that are not managed by myself, the author (Chris).


The opinions and perspectives expressed in my blogs contained herein are my own, and are not necessarily those of the sources linked to.  Conversely, I, the author, do not necessarily endorse, know about, or agree with everything expressed or written by the sources of these outside links.


Please feel free to address any feedback directly to me about my blog posts here on this site.  Also, I encourage you to inform me of any links that are no longer valid.  

FAIR USE NOTICE:  It is the author's (my) opinion and intention that the links and references included in the blogs posted on http://crnel727.blogspot.com connect to (re)sources that contribute to the points made in each respective blog and are not intended for profit purposes. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law.